Doom of the farmer, picture of poet Muktibodh and that poem… What is the politics of the picture?

0
61
Doom of the farmer, picture of poet Muktibodh and that poem… What is the politics of the picture?


Jolly LLB, a Cult franchise, when the trailer of the third edition came, I had a curiosity in my mind since. Now after watching the film, that curiosity got land. A picture was seen in the trailer- poet Muktibodh. This picture created a stir inside. The question deepened- what is the politics of this picture? A farmer is turning some pages, one of the same pages was very neatly paste of poet Muktibodh. There was respect in the mind, the question also arose as to what the picture of Muktibodh is saying in this film. Director-writer Subhash Kapoor has used it for what purpose. The biggest question was that the way the film was told by the comedy genre, what is the work of such veteran and realistic poet of Hindi. Well, in the film in which Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi are making two lawyers, Muktibodh should be in a big way?

But with this, those who play the role of a judge Saurabh Shukla Apart from this, there were some more such shadows, which made my mood serious. For example, the limits of her late husband’s statue were seen wrapped up from the feet of the statue, the definition of awakening the awareness of weak vs. was seen, the interesting arguments of the farmer vs. industrialist were seen, the court saw the judge’s cool and some famous lines of Muktibodh remembered- All the danger of expression will have to be raised… Or that What is your politics partner? So Subhash Kapoor got restless to watch a pure political film wrapped in syrup of this comedy. What is the politics of the director who wanted to know? What does a writer want to say?

Light of light against darkness

First of all, tell you that in Hindi literature, Muktibodh is known for the bumpy people of life. He has been called the most realistic and progressive poet of Hindi. He said on the injury of Danke in the sixties itself- The moon’s mouth is crookedIt was like showing the moon to the moon. This statement was like a whip for the beautyists who had so far not known how many romantic feelings and fiction of the moon, generations were looted on their dictionary. But the only poet was Muktibodh, who ran the moon on a rough ground. Not only the velvet roofs were removed, but also stalked on the tile roofs of the huts of the peasant-laborers. she wrote- Crooked and beautiful moon lights, the royal blessings of the moon… Azi Chandni is also a big pranks…

Picture of poet Muktibodh shown in the film

Muktibodh was the one who wrote that Now all the dangers of expression have to be raised, the monasteries and strongholds will have to be broken… In fact, the compositions of Muktibodh were the profits of light against darkness. And when we see Jolly LLB 3, it is realized that there is still no mildew on that profit. At a time when definitions, paradigms, honor, land and sky are changing the colors of all, chicken in virtual Nav Vihan- there are both Saurabh Shukla ‘paper’ and ‘Spirit’, who became judges in this film court there. They say- Some things are also done about ‘Spirit’, but most orders in this country are given on the basis of ‘paper’. It is clear that the understanding of ‘paper’ develops from ‘Spirit’ and that is told in this film. Proper justice is possible only when there will be ‘Spirit’ with ‘paper’.

If this ‘Spirit’ had been shown earlier, then the land of Raja Ram Solanki, a farmer of Parsaul village in the film’s story Bikaner to Boston Neither the development project would not be grabbed nor the farmer would have lost his life. The farmer who asserts the first right- My land my will, Then the moneylender gets trapped in the loop and loses the ground, removes the turban in front of the Tehsildar and says- My son has given his life for the country. But when it looks dark and dark all around, then he pushes his life in the same darkness, takes a dip of death. Some pictures and voice also shocks the heart in this necklace and sequence of Hilor.

Muktibodh peeping into the collage of clippings

The farmer is turning some pages. Some written rows emerge on paper above the screen. Some documents and some clippings collage. In this collage, the poet Gajanan Madhav Muktibodh emerges on a clipping. That familiar style of bidi and puffs in hand. For years, this picture has been like a stroke of Hindi literature. It is said that his compositions had gained fame during his lifetime, but not a single compilation of him was published during him. But as the time passed, his popularity in the writing-formation world increased equally fast. Evaluation and research were done. Now in 2025, the same Muktibodh is seen on the screen of the mainstream Hindi cinema, then it can be considered as a heart against ‘Math’ and ‘Garh’. Certainly its entire credit goes to the director-writer Subhash Kapoor.

Now those lines that are heard in the background at the time of suicide of helpless farmer like poetry recitation.

I still dripped

I prayed for rain

My grandfather to great grandfather

Father from grandfather

And I got the inheritance from my father

I wanted to hand over my son

Wanted to give a little land

And a handful of seed

Everyone’s hunger can be eradicated

So i believed

On everything of them

Say in speech on emotion

I kept looking enchanted

Their heads up towards the sky

And they pulled the ground from under my feet

I was proud to be a donor

This was my crime that

I was a farmer.

‘Our land, our will’

However, during this time, no information is written on the skin, whose poem has been written. But Muktibodh is present in the collage of sequences. And appear on the whole screen. Whether these lines are of Muktibodh or not, the writer of the film can be told or the scholar of Muktibodh literature. But there is no doubt that during this time the scene of the film has become a stir in any human body. At the beginning of the film, the disclaimer has been given that its story is inspired by the incident of Bhatta Parsaul village in Uttar Pradesh in 2011. In the film, it has been changed to the background of Rajasthan. By the way, the name of the village has been allowed to remain Parsaul.

The film’s one liner is the essence- Our land, our wish. Here, industrialist Haribhai Khaitan (Gajraj Rao) does all the tricks for the Bikaner to Boston project to vacate the village. Local administration, local MLAs and economists are also in his fist. And when the farmer Raja Ram Solanki took up his ‘danger’ of his will and rights in front of his strength, ‘Math’ and ‘Garh’ started moving. Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi, who have become two such lawyers, are less educated, they do not get work, are upset, keep fighting among themselves, but after knowing the pain of the widow of the farmer, they also change their heart and they also come united to raise ‘danger’ against excesses. On the other hand, the judge, who is disturbed by both the jaulis, makes his deserted life a Gulshan, also takes out the ‘danger’ of ‘Spirit’ by coming out of the ‘paper’.

Jllb 3 saurabh shukla

Saurabh Shukla became a judge

Tales to save land

Of course, the filmmaker of Jolly LLB 3 has also raised the ‘danger’ of impeccable expression here. The first is that the film was first told by the comedy genre. The poster or trailer of a film, Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi in the teaser, showed the crumb movements and if Saurabh Shukla is in the role of a mood judge, then this can be guessed. But after watching the whole film, don’t call it comedy, Yo is the story of the farmer’s doom. Comedy is its jacket, there is a darun dastan to save the land inside it. When Seema Biswas, who plays the widow wife of the farmer, weeps in the court and cries into the court.

Political message in picture

There is no history in the film, only the present speaks. This current seems to worry about its geography. The most beautiful side of the film is that all kinds of arguments have been kept here, which have always been said to be valid in their goals and trees. The industrialist has his own arguments, politics has its own argument, the administration and middlemen have their own side and the farmer also has his own side. The farmer requests that if the wishes of the powerful people are important, then why not the importance of his will and property.

The filmmaker has set his temporant very efficiently in this ‘Spirit’ of the court and this becomes the ‘politics’ of this picture. The film raises many questions through dialogues in a very interesting way. For example, farming should be taught in schools so that the new generation can know that the grain is grown in the fields and not in the super market.