The Karnataka Government in the Stampede case in Bengluru (Bengluru) has described RCB i.e. Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) responsible for Public Safety. This has been revealed in the recently released report. Also, the report also mentions a video of cricketer Virat Kohli.
On June 4, 11 people died in a stampede during the celebration after the IPL Trophy victory. At the same time, more than 50 people were injured. The report stated that the organizer of the program DNA Entertainment Network Private Limited had told the police only about the parade, but the formal permission of CrowD Control was not sought. It is mandatory to get permission. It states that permission for such event is sought 7 days ago.
Called people without talking to police
The report said that RCB invited people without consulting the police. It said that a photo was posted at 7.1 am in the morning, in which ‘free entry for people’ was said and the victory was invited for the procession. The procession was to start from the assembly and end at the Chinnaswamy Stadium.
The report said that on June 4, a post was done at 8 am and RCB posted a video clip at 8.55 am, in which cricketer Virat Kohli was seen. He was saying that the team wants to celebrate the victory with the people of Bangalore city.
The government says that due to this more than 3 lakh people came and the organizers or police were not ready for such a crowd. Apart from this, confusion also took place, as the organizers announced that a pass would be needed to come to the stadium at 3.14 pm.
It is reported that people became panic due to this. The report also said that RCB, DNA Entertainment and KSCA i.e. Karnataka State Cricket Association failed in harmony. Due to lack of proper planning at the entry gate and the gate being opened late, the system was deteriorated and stampede.
Court had given orders to make reports public
The Karnataka High Court had ordered the state government to make public the status report on the stampede incident on June 4. The state government had requested the High Court to keep this report confidential, but the court clearly stated on Monday, 14 July that there is no legal basis for such privacy.
