Thiruvananthapuram
Malayalam industry’s popular actress Vinci Eloshius had revealed the misconduct of a co-actor on the set of the film in the past. The actress said that the actor used to consume drugs, due to which she had to face problems. The actress did not disclose the name of the artist then. However, it must be announced that she will no longer work with any artist who takes drugs. Now recently Vinci has also revealed the name of that co-actor.
Post was written on social media in the past
According to news agency PTI, Vinci has now filed a formal complaint in the film Chamber. In this, he has described the actor’s name Shine Tom Chacko. In the past, Vinci accused a co-actor of behaving inappropriate under the influence of drugs on the set of a film. He shared a post on Instagram about this.
Uncomfortable incident during the shooting of the film, Vinci said that during the shooting of a film, his co-actor not only treated him in an improper manner in a state of intoxication, but also created a very uncomfortable situation. He said that “I had a problem in my dress and I went to fix it. Then that actor said in front of everyone that he would come and fix my dress. This comment was made in front of everyone, which made the atmosphere very uncomfortable.”
In addition to this phenomenon openly intake of drugs on the set, Vinci shared another shocking details. He said that during the rehearsal of a scene, he saw the actor spitting some kind of white powder on the table. “It was clear that he was consuming drugs on the set of the film. Such behavior deteriorates,” he said.
The producer and director were also aware of the incident, Vinci said that the director of the film and other team members were also aware of the incident, but since the actor was playing the lead role, the film had to be completed somehow. He said, “The director went and talked to him, but the team had limited options as he was the lead actor.” Vinci said that “this is not a personal decision, but a question of the purity of the set” he clarified that his purpose is not to comment on one’s personal life, but to focus on that such behavior affects the entire set. “When someone obstructs the work of others with his personal decision, it is not right to remain silent.”
