YouTuber Ranveer Ilahabadiya, who came into controversy by commenting on parents, has requested the Supreme Court on Monday to allow his show (Show) to a broadcast on social media.
In the India Got Latant case, ranbir Allahabadia (Ranvir Ilahabadiya) has got a big relief from the Supreme Court. The court has allowed Ranveer to do the show. The hearing on Ranveer’s application is going on in the Supreme Court. Allahabadia filed an application in the Supreme Court and demanded amendment to the order. In which it was said that the petitioner and his companions would not do any shows till further orders. It was said by Allahabadia that he had 280 employees. They are also questioned by their living, they also interview celebrities.
Being right does not mean anything
SC said that there is a person who is now 75 years old and does a comic show. You should see how it is done. The whole family can see this. This is talent. It is not talent to use the rump language. It has an element of creativity and talent. SG said that yes, there are many comedians who use good behavior and strongly criticize the government. The Supreme Court said that having a fundamental right to speak does not mean that anyone can speak anything. Everyone watchs this show. Children see, son and daughter, parents all see.
What did the court say on pornographic content of social media
The court said that moral standards of different society may vary. We have guaranteed ourselves rights. But they are subject to conditions. The Supreme Court has taken a big step on social media content. In favor of the rules that balance the balance between morality and freedom, the Supreme Court asked the Center to consider such draft rules. The Center asked to invite the opinion of stakeholders including media on rules for online material. The court said that the humor is something that the whole family can enjoy. Talent does not use vulgar language.
Our assumptions are different from other countries
SG said that our perceptions about morality can be very different from other countries. There should be some guidelines. Justice Suryakant said that society rate society, moral standards may vary. We have guaranteed rights for ourselves, but they are subject to conditions. Some need to be done. Some guidelines should be fixed. Our perceptions about morality are very different from other countries. Burning the flag in the US is a fundamental right under the first amendment and here it is a crime
SC said that but we have the right to expression, the right to speak. Justice Kant said that but we do not want any regulatory system that is about censorship. But it cannot be an independent platform for all. Justice Kant said that imagine which limited regulatory measures can be that there is no censorship. Which should contain some element of control to some extent. It is also a question of nutrition of future generations. If something needs to be done, if someone wants to see something on the channel, then let it see.
Assam police called yet
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that it is not only porn. I saw the show and I say with full responsibility that I and Attorney General cannot watch the show together. The Assam Police had called but he did not come. Justice Kant said that there are some people who are writing articles on freedom of expression etc. We know how to handle them. Duties come after every fundamental right. There are also restrictions.
There will be repentance on your actions
SG said let them remain silent for some time. Justice Kant said that we hope that he will repent on his actions. Now on his channel, he will not speak any language that does not violate the moral structure of the society. Whether it is of any age group. Such are subject to moral and decency standards. SG said that I do not want to come in the way. The Supreme Court said that yes, there are 280 employees and even their families are at stake.
Court’s question on porn content
The Supreme Court had also strongly criticized him for the comments for those comments for those comments for the arrests filed against social media ‘Influencer’ Ranveer Allahabadia for allegedly making indecent remarks during a YouTube program. Intervening in this case, the Supreme Court had asked the Center whether it was going to do something about pornographic materials on YouTube and other social media.
Ranveer Allahabadia accepted a mistake
Podcaster Ranveer Allahabadia has said in his statement to Maharashtra Cyber Police that he has made a mistake by making a controversial statement. Allahabad’s indecent remarks during a YouTube show caused controversy. Maharashtra Cyber and Mumbai Police Comedian is investigating the controversial remarks made by Allahabadia on Comedian time Raina’s YouTube show ‘India’s Got Latent’.
Why Ranveer Allahabadia in controversies
Allahabadia had made indecent remarks about parents and sex, which was criticized a lot across the country and an FIR was lodged in the case. People’s anger broke out on social media against Ranveer too. This is the reason why strict action was demanded against Ranveer on social media.