S Narayan, the famous producer and director of Kannada cinema, recently reached the police. His complaint was that someone is tarnishing his image by sending wrong messages from fake excults in his name. However, now S Narayan is once again trapped in legal trouble. He has been accused of dowry harassment by his daughter -in -law Pavitra and a police complaint.
S Narayan is a legendary filmmaker of Kannada cinema. He has directed more than 50 films. S Narayan’s domestic dispute has now come to the police station. His daughter -in -law has made many serious allegations against him. Pavitra had complained at the Gyan Bharati police station in Bengaluru, alleging the father -in -law. Taking action, the police have registered an FIR against the filmmaker.
Husband and mother -in -law also took wrapped
Along with her father-in-law S Narayan, Pavitra has also accused her husband Pawan and mother-in-law Bhagyavati in this case. He has complained against the whole family. Pavitra has also told that after harassing him for dowry, he has also been thrown out of the house. It has been ten months since the filmmaker’s daughter -in -law left her in -laws.
Pavitra gave 10 lakhs with loans
Pavitra married S Narayan’s son Pawan in the year 2021. However, after four years, this relationship has reached the verge of breaking up. Pavitra alleges that even after giving dowry in marriage, more money was being demanded from them. Pavitra said, “Pawan had no job. So I was running home after working myself.” He further told that he was asked for money to start ‘Kalasamrat Team Academy’. He pledged his jewelry and raised money. Later, took a loan of 10 lakh and gave it to the husband Pawan. However, the Kalasamrat team academy became bankrupt and closed.
What did S Narayan say on the daughter -in -law’s allegations?
S Narayan’s statement has also come in this case. He said, “It has been 10 months since Pavitra left home. If I asked him why he left the house, it would be like a stigma in his name. Our conversation was stopped only after a month of marriage.” He further said that his daughter -in -law did not give importance to age or personality.
