Islamabad’s economy could not withstand war to save Pakistan

0
136
Islamabad’s economy could not withstand war to save Pakistan


New Delhi

US President Donald Trump posted a post on social media on the evening of 10 May and an agreement was reached between India and Pakistan. After this, there was a festive atmosphere in the pictures from Pakistan, while the silence was taken in India. Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif even congratulated the Pakistani Army, calling it his victory.

Us-China unanimous: Is the Khushi agreement celebrated in Pakistan or because Trump has saved defeat? From what perspective the people of India see it? This issue was between two countries, so why did Trump announce it? Is it not its message that Trump wanted to save Pakistan. By the way, China also did not want India-Pakistan conflict to continue because in some cases it was also beaten up, America fulfilled his wish. So was America and China agree on the issue of Pakistan?

Trump’s restlessness: In principle, Pakistan has the same importance for China in South Asia, which is Israel for America in West Asia. America is also looking at Pakistan from this perspective. Is it not that for this reason Trump was so restless? The tweet by the former Army Chief General Ved Prakash Malik after the agreement means some, ‘The ceasefire 10 May 2025: We have left India’s future to ask whether India has gained any political or strategic benefit from its actions after the Pakistani terror attack (in Pahalgam) (in Pahalgam) after the Pakistani terror attack (in Pahalgam). Some such former army chief Manoj Narwane has also written in the last line of his tweet, ‘… We cannot lose our lives every time by reacting on events. This is the third time, now there is no other chance.

Unheard call: This could be a happy opportunity for Trump, he managed to convey a message to the world that America is still the leader of the world. His Foreign Minister also publicized it. America was hurt by human loss. Should also be. But is any nation more than India endowed with human sensibilities? Not clearly. Since the 1990s, India has been giving proof of the terrorist antics of Pakistan to the world, but no one listened. However, as soon as the 9/11 incident occurred, the US launched a war against terrorism. When America spread havoc in Kabul, didn’t the common Afghan die?

Silence on Pakistan: After Kabul, the US targeted Baghdad, which had no justification. Yes, he may be seeing some dangers from Saddam Hussain, and he destroyed Baghdad. The world was silent or applauding at that time. The world also remained silent on the fact that Pakistan is the Epacetor of Terrorism in South Asia, and there was no action on it.

Root of terror: It has been established that Pakistan is the root of terrorism in Asia. However, the US made him a warlord in the Afghan war. It was also said by US Army General David Petras that al-Qaeda, Pakistani Taliban, Afghan Taliban, TNSM (Tehreek-e-Nafaj-e-Shiyat-e-Mohammadi) is a symbiotic relationship, yet the US remained silent.

The pressure was increasing: There were reports of international media that Pakistan is under considerable pressure. The American newspaper Wall Street Journal wrote, ‘India has taken action on terrorist organizations and gave a message to Pakistan that it will no longer tolerate such attacks. Pakistan is struggling with internal problems. Imran Khan is in jail, elections have been disputed. The country is in economic crisis…. ‘

Nervousness in Pakistan: There the possibility of implementation of coup or martial law was gaining momentum. Top leader and senior military officers started sending their money abroad. This was revealed in the investigation of Pakistan’s State Bank. On the other hand, it was difficult to get dollars from Pakistan’s Open Exchange Market. He had a foreign exchange reserves left to pay 12 days of import bills. If the next installment of the bailout package was not released from the IMF, then the economic activities of Pakistan would have come to a standstill. Now the question is, what indicates the IMF in which the leaf does not move without the American desire, what indicates to get a loan to Pakistan even after the opposition of India?

Saved from disintegration: America was well aware that Pakistan would have to kneel in front of India due to the economy resting on debt. America did not want this to happen and Pakistan should be shattered. There is no challenge for India in South Asia. America did not accept this. He had to save Pakistan and had only one way, compromise.