The demand for removal of Aurangzeb (Aurangzeb) in Sambhaji Nagar, Maharashtra has gained momentum. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis including Congress (Congress), Shiv Sena MNS has all supported it in unison.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that we also have a desire to remove Aurangzeb’s grave, but it is a protected place. During the Congress government, it was protected from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). At the same time, the Congress has targeted the BJP, responding. Congress leader Nana Patole said that Devendra Fadnavis has been the Chief Minister three times. It is not right to accuse the Congress every time. Seeing the current situation, the government should take a decision itself.
How can our thoughts be different
BJP leader Sudhir Mungantiwar said, “I had removed encroachment from Afzal’s grave, so how can I think about this issue?” The Maha Vikas Aghadi government wanted to maintain a grave, while our government is in favor of removing it. An attackers like Aurangzeb should not be glorified. He was the greatest wicked after Ravana. Shiv Sena leader Shambhuraje Desai said that our government is in favor of removing Aurangzeb’s grave. The Chief Minister and both the Deputy Chief Ministers will talk to the Central Government on this issue.
Not like wrong: Bhosle
Shivendraraje Bhosle clarified on this issue, Aurangzeb’s grave should not live in Maharashtra. There is no such thing as anyone feels wrong in this. Along with this, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) leader Bala Nandgaonkar, taking a tough stand on the issue, said, there is no need for Aurangzeb, who has hurt Shivaji Maharaj and kill Sambhaji Maharaj. It should be removed as soon as possible.
Controversy after Abu Azmi’s statement
Abu Azmi, while defending Aurangzeb, made a statement that I do not consider the 17th -century Mughal emperor Aurangzeb as a cruel, tyrannical or intolerant ruler. These days, a distorted image of the Mughal emperor is being created through films. However, after this statement, Abu Azmi gave an explanation on the heat of politics and said that I cannot even think of speaking against Shivaji Maharaj and Sambhaji Maharaj.
Abu Azmi said that my words have been shown by distorting. I have said what historians and writers have said about Aurangzeb. I have not made any derogatory comment about Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Sambhaji Maharaj or any other great man. He said that I am not so big.
What I said was actually a expression of some historians. If someone is hurt due to these statements, then I apologize unconditionally and take back my statement. A case has been registered against him in Thane, Maharashtra for rhetoric on Aurangzeb.
