Bhopal
NGT itself has taken cognizance of the mysterious death of elephants in Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve of Madhya Pradesh. NGT has issued notices to many officials in this matter. These include Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Madhya Pradesh), Chief Wildlife Warden (MP), Collector (Umaria), Director of Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Director of Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and Secretary of the Union Agriculture Ministry. .
Report sought within a week
At the same time, NGT has asked everyone to file their reply within a week, before the next hearing. The matter initially came before the principal bench of the NGT, which was later transferred to the central bench. The NGT order cites reports that link the death of 10 elephants in Bandhavgarh to the consumption of contaminated Kodo millet.
These are the initial reasons
Initial investigations suggest that the deaths may have been caused by mycotoxin contamination in millet. Samples from the affected area were sent to two laboratories for further analysis, the Indian Veterinary Research Institute in Uttar Pradesh and a forensic lab in Sagar, Madhya Pradesh.
Mycotoxins have an effect
The NGT order further states that Kodo millet, which is a staple food in many parts of India, is known for its high fiber and mineral content. However, when it becomes infected with mycotoxins. Especially in humid conditions during monsoon season, it can cause fungal infection. This contamination can pose serious health risks to both humans and animals. This can cause liver and kidney damage as well as gastrointestinal problems.
Kodo is being held responsible
It is alleged that the elephants in Bandhavgarh may have consumed contaminated Kodo millet or its by-products, resulting in poisoning. The elephants are believed to have died from mycotoxins produced by fungal contamination. The NGT has expressed concern about such cascading effects. She said this could pose a threat to both wildlife and livestock that could come into contact with the contaminated crop.
Cited this decision
The NGT also said that the incident could potentially be a violation of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and the Environment Protection Act, 1986, giving rise to significant environmental compliance issues. The tribunal asserted its right to take suo motu cognizance of the case. For this, the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha and others (2021 SCC Online SC 897) was cited.
Asked for reply within a week
As part of its order, the NGT directed the state and central government officials to file their replies in the form of affidavits before the central regional bench of the tribunal at least a week before the next hearing. The Tribunal also clarified that if a respondent files a reply without the advice of his legal counsel, he will have to remain virtually present to assist the Tribunal.
The case was transferred to this bench as it was within the jurisdiction of the Central Regional Bench in Bhopal. The original case records were directed to be forwarded accordingly.
